COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Two policemen who confronted a man carrying an air rifle in a Wal-Mart have asked a court to let them wait to give formal statements about the deadly police shooting in a lawsuit while a federal criminal investigation is pending.
In court filings, their attorneys said Beavercreek police Officer Sean Williams and Sgt. David Darkow face an “impossible and conflicting” choice: give statements that could contribute to a potential criminal case against them, or invoke their constitutional right against self-incrimination and skip an opportunity to defend themselves in the civil case.
It stems from the August 2014 death of 22-year-old John Crawford III of Fairfield, a black man who was shot by Williams, who is white, after a 911 caller reported seeing someone waving a gun at the store in the Dayton suburbs. Police said Crawford appeared to have a real weapon and didn’t respond to orders to drop it. Investigators determined Crawford was talking on a cellphone and had picked up the air rifle from a store shelf. The case became part of a national dialogue about police use of force and the role of race.
The officers argue the interests of justice would be served if the court grants their request to temporarily postpone their depositions, perhaps for months, while the Department of Justice reviews whether civil rights violations occurred.
In response, attorneys for Crawford’s family noted the officers already provided statements and testified before the grand jury that concluded the shooting was justified. Their request is an attempt “to pick and choose when they will, or will not, discuss Mr. Crawford’s death” and should be rejected, the family’s lawyers wrote.
The officers’ lawyers say a similar stay was granted in a lawsuit with a pending criminal investigation in another highly publicized Ohio case about a fatal shooting by police — in the Cleveland death of Tamir Rice, a 12-year-old black boy who had a pellet gun.
But Crawford’s family’s attorneys say that’s different because the officers involved hadn’t given statements and the case hadn’t been considered by a grand jury for possible state charges.
The lawsuit by Crawford’s relatives, who say he was “shot on sight,” was filed against Beavercreek police and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and alleges negligence and civil rights violations. The city and Wal-Mart denied the allegations.
Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.